CLRN Network Project Process

CLRN Network Project Process

Reform projects within the Network will proceed across four stages.

 

Stage 1: Identifying the area of law 

 

The first task for each new project is to select a suitable area of law for review. This is done at a CLRN Network meeting, with members of the network encouraged to attend and/or provide written recommendations.

Our conference in September 2016 ‘Criminal Law Reform Now’ explored twelve ideas for potential law reform, focusing on legislative change. These proposals will be published as a collection in 2019. Any of these proposals would make a viable project for the CLRN Network, but we are not limited to these proposals, and we are not limited to a legislative focus. There are very few restrictions on the kinds of project the CLRN Network can take on. We restrict ourselves to comprehensible ideas for specified reforms, excluding those which would only be expected to receive academic support or understanding. We will target areas where there is sufficient expertise to form a useful project team. However, we are open to exploring ideas which are comprehensible even though they might be thought likely to encounter political resistance, nor do we restrict ourselves to reforms which require legislation. We will be happy to consider projects across the criminal law piste: including procedural, evidential, sentencing and substantive issues, as well as topics that combine these.    

 

Stage 2: Identifying the issues, and forming the team

 

Having identified the area of law, the next stage is to reach out to members of the CLRN Network and beyond (principally though the SLS, and our mailing list) to find relevant experts working and/or researching in the field. These individuals are brought together for a full day conference exploring various aspects of the legal topic, and identifying issues that require further review within the project. Shortly after this scoping event, we form a core Project Team of 6-10 authors.

The proceedings from the conference will feed into the working of the project team. They may also be published separately by the authors.  

 

Stage 3: Writing the Report, and flexible consultation

 

The project team are responsible for drafting the CLRN Network Report, exploring the relevant area of law and setting out recommendations for reform. Project teams, with support from the CLRN Network Directors and Committee, may also conduct consultation exercises as appropriate to the project. Reports will typically be around 100 pages in length, and written in an accessible style. Lastly, the CLRN Network Directors and Committee review the Report and offer comments, before it is finalised. 

 

Stage 4: Dissemination and impact

 

CLRN Network Reports are intended to have maximum impact on their chosen target for legal reform. With this in mind, reports will be made immediately available for free on our CLRN Network webpage. Further to this, print copies will be made and sent to relevant people within the targeted reform institution or body. A range of publicity will also be considered at this stage, including interviews with print media, launch symposium, public meetings etc. The CLRN Network Committee and Project Team will continue to work with the target reform institution or body to take the proposals forward. Team members will remain free to publish their contributions or adapted contributions, under their own name, outside the Network Report, respecting the copyright of other Network contributors.

 

Current Projects

 

Review of the Computer Misuse Act 1990

 

Project Lead: Simon McKay 

 

Project Completed - Report Published in January 2020

Reforming the Computer Misuse Act 1990 is the CLRNN’s first report. The Computer Misuse Act 1990 (CMA 1990) is now almost 30 years old. In the years since it has not kept pace with rapid technological change. It is clear that the CMA 1990 requires significant reform to make it fit for the 21st century.

The report identifies various problems with the CMA 1990 and provides detailed analysis and expert recommendations for reform. This includes recommendations for primary legislative reform of offence definitions and the creation of new defences, as well as associated measures to clarify guidance for prosecutors and sentencing courts.   

 

Review of Private Prosecutions

 

Project Lead: Jonathan Rogers

 

In 2009 the then Director of Public Prosecutions, without consultation, promulgated a new policy on overtaking private prosecutions, requiring the CPS to do so in any case where the CPS’s own Code tests (the evidential and public interest tests) were not met. This was held to be lawful by a 3-2 majority of the Supreme Court. Whether this is an appropriate policy requires a study of its effect on disappointed would-be private prosecutors and affords an opportunity to consider what purposes private prosecutions may serve and which offences are most effectively prosecuted privately. Reforms to this policy, if any, may be suggested to the CPS, suggestions may be made to the police about policies regarding the gathering of evidence for private prosecutors, issues relating to costs may require legislation, or the attention of judges who assess costs under present legislation. 

 

Status: We held a scoping symposium on this project in April 2018 at UCL; and a Framework Document was published in October 2018. We are currently working with authors on draft chapters for the report, to be discussed at our mid-project symposium in January 2021. The final report will be published later in 2021. 

 

 

Search

Join the network

Enter your email here for updates on CLRN Network work and publications.